JFJaka Fefer · Portfolio
Drafts
Layers
Otaris
Otaris logo

Otaris

Investors had no way into curated early-stage deals and no way to sell vested allocations, so I designed the whole investor platform, from onboarding to a marketplace for partial allocations, and it was fully designed when the company pivoted before launch.

Role

Founding Product Designer

Dates

2021 - 2022

Team

Product, design and engineering

Otaris staking page. Personal info, unclaimed rewards and wallet balance at the top, a side menu, and three staking pools with APY, staked balance and potential rewards.
Membership marketplace. Four NFT tiers across the top, with asks and bids for Officer memberships priced in OTA and market buy and sell actions.
Memberships page with KYC status. Senator, Ambassador, Officer and Citizen tiers on the left, the Citizen badge and its mint limit, requirement and allocation on the right.
Three phone screens. An ongoing sale with countdown and progress, staking pools with harvest actions, and the membership tier detail.

Impact

  • Otaris did not launch in its original form. The company pivoted to Web3 startup services before release, so there are no usage numbers.
  • What exists is a fully designed investor platform, from onboarding and NFT tiers to staking, claiming and a secondary marketplace, plus the admin side for launching sales.

Problem

Otaris was a two-sided marketplace. Investors bought NFT tiers for access to curated early-stage deals; after investing they could track allocations, claim vested tokens, farm and stake, and trade allocations on a built-in secondary market. Startups got a structured way to launch. On the investor side the gaps were access and liquidity: no way into curated deals and no way to sell a vested allocation. On the startup side it was launch infrastructure and finding the right investors. All of that tokenomics had to become a platform an ordinary investor could use, with trust anchored in patterns they already knew.

  • Liquidity traders, allocation seekers and capital-seeking builders wanted different things from the same screens
  • Familiar portfolio patterns did more for trust than any novel interaction

Decisions

1. Trade partial allocations, not whole accounts

The only way out of a position was a full exit, which left liquidity locked and gave investors no way to act on a single project.

I designed the marketplace around trading individual project allocations, with asks and bids per tier, so an investor can sell part of a position and keep the rest.

Evidence. A granular liquidity layer that matched how the three investor types behaved. The marketplace is the second screen above.

2. An admin panel for launching sales

Every project launch was manual coordination between the team and the startup, and it would not have survived more than a handful of projects.

I designed an admin dashboard where a startup configures the sale, vesting schedule and tokenomics, with a status track from draft to vesting created on chain.

Admin dashboard for a private sale. A status track from draft to vesting created on chain, then tabs for sale overview, configuration, claiming and deployment, with the sale form.

Evidence. Launch structures became standard and manual coordination fell away as more projects came in.

3. Uncapped lower NFT tiers

The CEO wanted hard caps on every tier to make them scarce. The lower tiers had modest benefits, so a cap would have meant less revenue for the company and users left out for no real gain.

I argued for capping only the premium tiers and controlling allocation sizes instead, and that is what we designed.

Made against the founders' preference at the time.

Memberships panel. The Citizen tier selected, showing an unlimited mint limit, a 3,000 OTA requirement and a 40% guaranteed IDO pool allocation.

Evidence. Entry stayed open while the premium tiers kept their exclusivity.

Reflection

  • Marketplace systems are incentive systems. Liquidity mechanics shape behaviour as much as the interface does.
  • Financial products need trust grounded in familiar patterns.
  • Organisational alignment is a product risk like any other.
G
Otaris
Founding Product Designer
2021 - 2022
Product, design and engineering
Ljubljana, Slovenija
CET (UTC+1)
RemoteOpen to work
Product Design (UI/UX)
UX Research
Design Systems
Interaction Design
Risk-aware UX & Trust Design
Data-dense Interface Design
Prototyping & Validation
User Journey Mapping
Google UX Design Professional
Responsive Web Design, freeCodeCamp
Graphic & Media Technology Degree